top of page

Who Is Really Responsible for Inflation?

Most people take inflation as being the increase in the price of goods and

services and usually blame greedy businesses, labour unions and speculators

for inflation. It certainly seems to be a valid explanation of inflation but in

this article we will look back at the classical definition of inflation that has not

been taught in schools or universities for about fifty years. It is only when

we understand what inflation is that we are better able to protect ourselves

from it.

In my previous article entitled Understanding Money I noted how the

goldsmiths and the bankers started issuing promissory notes for money

and that money was gold and silver coinage or specie. We also saw that

the bankers, along with the UK government, stopped redeeming theses

notes for gold after the beginning of the First World War. By 1933 the US

banks did the same and in 1971 President Nixon also took the dollar off

the Bretton Woods agreement in which the US Treasury promised other

governments to redeem one troy ounce of gold for $35 in currency.

What we need to understand is that inflation is purely a monetary

phenomenon. The Oxford English Dictionary of 1925 defined “inflate” as

“abnormally increase (State’s currency esp. by issue of inconvertible paper)”.

So in the UK, governments and the Bank of England have been issuing

inconvertible (into gold) currency and credit since 1914 and the world in

general since 1971. So the currency that we use is really a promissory note

for another promissory note as that is what the Bank of England now tells

us if we ask them about the promise from the chief cashier at the top of its

notes. I myself have phoned the Bank of England press office about this and

I was advised that “I Promise to pay the bear on demand the sum of £20”

simply means is that I may exchange an old and/or damaged £20 note for

a new one.

You might be asking: what does all this have to do with inflation? So prior

to 1914 UK banks had to convert bank notes on demand by the bearer or

customer into gold sovereigns. So if you went to your bank with a £5 note,

the bank would pay you with 5 gold sovereigns as each sovereign had a

face value of £1. The convertibility of the currency into real money or gold

forced the banks and the Bank of England to limit the issuance of currency

and credit unbacked by real money or gold as there was the risk that too

many customers might ask for redemption all at once. To understand how

inflating or creating too much inconvertible currency results in higher prices,

one only needs to understand the law of supply and demand.

If we went to a market to buy a turkey for Christmas only to find out

that because of a delivery problem there were only 5 turkeys instead

of the usual 100 turkeys, it would be natural for the seller of the turkeys

to raise the price of turkeys and still be able to sell them. So the supply

of currency relative to turkeys would go up dramatically and that would

lead to an increase in the value of turkeys relative to currency. If you read

Understanding Money you should know that money evolved from barter

and that under a barter system one person exchanges something of value

for another thing of value. Therefore when the banking and credit system

is able to create inconvertible currency, or what is nowadays called fiat

currency, without limit that currency becomes worth less versus real goods

and services that cannot be created at the same pace as the currency.

So the consequence of inflation is the loss of purchasing power of the

currency and that feels like prices are rising but it is actually the currency

that is dropping in value. Nowadays though, we are told that the

government measures of price rises like the CPI or RPI are inflation even

tough price rises or the drop in the value of the currency are caused by the

over issuance of currency. The reason schools and universities don’t teach

the real definition of inflation, in my opinion, is that the financial sector has become so powerful that its influence has become widespread in society.

The government plays along with it because inflation means it can borrow

more in order to buy votes. Nowadays we are told that higher holiday

prices or higher secondhand car prices caused inflation or the CPI to rise

and that is how we are being fooled and distracted from the real creators of

inflation. It is actually the excess creation of currency and credit relative to

services and goods that lead to the rise in holiday or secondhand car prices.

So now we will use the Bank of England’s own so-called Inflation Calculator,

which in reality calculates the rise in the cost of living since 1209. Another

way to look at it is the how the currency of the realm has performed through

time. First we will look at how many pounds one needed in 1914 to buy the

same amount of goods that £1 could buy in 1209. So according to the Old

Lady’s own calculator,

inflation/inflation-calculator, by 1914 the pound had lost on average 0.4%

per annum over 705 years and one needed £17.65 of 1914 pounds to buy

the equivalent of £1 in 1209. From 1209 to 2019 the average increase in

prices more than doubles to 0.9% per annum so the impact of 105 years

of fiat currency and the abandonment of a sound money system has been

dramatic. So we need £2051.99 of today’s money to buy the equivalent of

£1 in 1209 and £17.65 in 1914.

We have also been told that since Gordon Brown, then Chancellor of the

Exchequer, gave the Bank of England independence in 1997 that inflation

has been under control and sometimes we are even told that there is a

danger of falling prices. To dispel that myth let us look at how the pound

in your pocket has fared since 1997. So according to the inflation calculator

the average rate of price rises since 1997 has been 2.8% per annum and you

now need £1.83 to buy what you could with £1 in 1997.

It is very hard to then protect one’s savings versus inflation and especially

now with the rate of interest being kept at almost zero since the GFC of

2008. Investors and savers have had to put their hard-earned savings

at risk in the stock market and riskier investments that provide a higher

yield or interest. Getting on the property ladder has helped too as bricks

and mortars are limited in supply unlike fiat currency. Having some gold

sovereigns and silver Britannias have also helped savers as the same concept

of the law and supply and demand that applies to property applies to real

money or gold and silver.

So the next time you are told the packaged holidays led to a rise in inflation

just remember that is government and our current monetary system that

are responsible for it.

N.B. The views here are my opinion and not investment advice.


Use promo code maneco64 to get a 0.5% discount on physical gold and silver bullion purchases at

GlintPay App, Save and Spend in Gold - Use referral code MarioGlint79

Teespring Store:

Crypto donations: BITCOIN: 1AkNoKzbZXJ75BbeGkD2ekUDJQNWDrBgMA BITCOIN CASH: qzfcsu05c9ephzv8qzl7ysvn4lfclzneescfhre4r5 BSV: qr20w4glrt5urr63c2xrqaxa3ken2qy5hqdxr3kv34 ETHEREUM: 0x990C216CE9218943307319D5F9DAd602A9A872DC BAT Currency: Uphold a/c name maneco

1,176 views5 comments

Recent Posts

See All


Fed is Rothschild's 150 family's 1%ers row economy people can't get back to where they were there were no collapses of money for green backs only fed money witch they control. This is not high res company government tricked by greed cheap money buys all government offices wacco oaklahoma city bombing 911 had to happen why patriot act and more. Oaklahoma city bombing truck rear two blocks a way concrete not touched by bomb truck fbi not in building charges put in columns explosion lifted floor up look at pics meet general army he agreed with this. Pentagon missile not plane no 6000 lb engines metel don't burn at that temp. Loses change movie internet look for


Fed cause all inflation jp morgan was to be on Titanic cancelled one day before he died only owned 17% of holdings lutenant of Rothschild's like rockefeller


Bill Garrett
Bill Garrett
Jan 08, 2021

Because perception is reality. Aside from the fact that 98% of people just accept whatever the government tells them to. Witness the recent political events and virus convolution. 😐


Jan 08, 2021

I read "Understanding Money", but all my life I have never understood why fiat currencies have any purchasing power whatsoever. With the backing of precious metals, it makes some sense, but without, no sense at all. Why does anyone accept dollars or pounds? The promise of more worthless paper?


Bill Garrett
Bill Garrett
Jan 07, 2021

Request a presentation on the ongoing manipulation of physical metal and why it's happening.

bottom of page